Band-aids and Gimmicks, Georgia-Style

In a recent post, I reflected on some of the less than savory tactics currently being employed to catch pedophiles and how such seemed to offer “band-aids and gimmicks in lieu of substantive solutions.” Lo and behold, the state of Georgia has just enacted a law to deal with registered sex offenders that shows considerably more cruelty than common sense, as reported here by the Washington Post:

Some Curbs on Sex Offenders Called Ineffective, Inhumane

As convicted sex offenders go, they seem to pose little danger.

One is 100 years old. Another can barely walk and is in the late stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Another is dying of heart disease in a nursing home.

Yet under a new Georgia law, thousands of registered sex offenders, even the old and feeble, could be pushed from their homes and hospices.

“He doesn’t really know anything about it,” said Ruby Anderson, 77, whose husband was convicted of having sex with a minor in 1997 and, at 81, no longer recognizes members of his family because of Alzheimer’s disease. “The trouble is, I just don’t know where we can go.”

As states around the country have sought in recent years to control the whereabouts of convicted sex offenders, Georgia’s law stands out as one of the toughest, a testament to the daunting public fears regarding children’s safety.

The roughly 10,000 sex offenders living in Georgia have been forbidden to live within 1,000 feet of a school, playground, church or school bus stop. Taken together, the prohibitions place nearly all the homes in some counties off-limits — amounting, in a practical sense, to banishment.

“My intent personally is to make it so onerous on those that are convicted of these offenses . . . they will want to move to another state,” Georgia House Majority Leader Jerry Keen (R), who sponsored the bill, told reporters.

Since the law’s enactment in July, however, a federal judge, human rights advocates and even some of the sheriff’s departments that are supposed to enforce the measure have suggested that the zeal for safety may have gone too far.

The residency law applies not only to sexual predators but to all people registered for sexual crimes, including men and women convicted of having underage consensual sex while in high school. [full text]

About these ads

One response

  1. there are actually some pretty nasty old dudes in nursing homes, but i can’t say i support tossing them out into the street. age doesn’t always make a person better, but the goal is to protect children. when an offender is disabled and in a facility, it’s easy to make a rule that no children will be allowed to visit him without supervision.
    i don’t go for the congressman’s greyhound therapy approach either. forcing offenders to move to another state won’t protect children. it’s much better to make them account to their parole officers as ordered and know where they are. and we need to give our children honest information about what behavior they don’t have to tolerate, and encourage them to talk about anyone who bothers them.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 992 other followers

%d bloggers like this: