Reed Amendment Passes, Protects Endangered Polar Bears

This didn’t get much media attention, but it is a worthy act: to close the loophole in the Marine Mammal Protection Act that still allows hunters to import and sell the heads and hides of polar bears. From MediaNewswire.com:

Today, the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations approved an amendment to the FY 2008 Interior Appropriations bill to protect polar bears in the Arctic by blocking American trophy hunters from importing their heads and hides. The Committee approved the amendment, offered by Senator Jack Reed ( D-R.I. ), by voice vote.

The Marine Mammal Protection Act, passed in 1972, generally prohibits the import of products from marine mammals, such as whales, dolphins, seals, and polar bears. But in 1994, a loophole was created to allow American trophy hunters to bring home polar bear heads and hides from Canada. Over the last decade, American trophy hunters received more than 800 permits to import polar bear trophies.

“The polar bear has become the iconic species for the devastating effects of global warming,” said Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States. “It just makes no sense to allow Americans to shoot and import polar bears when these animals are facing so many tangible threats to their very existence.”

The Safari Club International gives out a “Bears of the World” hunting achievement award to individuals who shoot four of the eight species of bears in the world, and that awards program drives competitive killing of polar bears in the Arctic.

The HSUS expressed its thanks to Senator Jack Reed for leading this important effort, and to Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert C. Byrd ( D-W.V. ) and Interior Appropriations Subcommittee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein ( D-Calif. ) for their strong support.

“Polar bears are rapidly becoming an endangered species. It is illegal to hunt these bears for sport in the United States. Trophy hunters shouldn’t be able to skirt the spirit of U.S. law by killing polar bears abroad and bringing their heads back across the border to America,” said Senator Reed, a member of the Appropriations Subcommittee on the Interior and Environment. “This amendment will ensure that the United States shuts down this practice and prevents the killing of these animals for their heads.”

The Reed Amendment accomplishes a similar goal as the Polar Bear Protection Act � S. 1406 by Senators John Kerry ( D-Mass. ) and Olympia Snowe ( R-Maine ), and H.R. 2327 by Representatives Jay Inslee ( D-Wash. ) and Frank LoBiondo ( R-N.J. ) � which would permanently close the polar bear trophy hunting loophole in the Marine Mammal Protection Act. The HSUS, Defenders of Wildlife, International Fund for Animal Welfare, and other humane and conservation groups back the legislation and are grateful to these legislative leaders.

“With polar bears facing clear threats presented by climate change, the U.S. should not be funding unnecessary trophy hunting of this charismatic species,” said Cindy Milburn, acting director of IFAW, DC. “IFAW applauds the committee and Senator Reed for taking steps to provide polar bears with much needed protection.”

Facts:

Scientists estimate there are 21,500-25,000 polar bears in the Arctic � more than half are in Canada and most of these are in the territory of Nunavut. Throughout their range, polar bears currently face unprecedented threats from global climate change, environmental degradation, and hunting for subsistence and sport.

In 2005, the IUCN ( World Conservation Union ) uplisted the polar bear on its Red List from a species of “least concern” to “vulnerable” for the first time. The IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group has announced that polar bear populations could drop 30 percent in the coming 35�50 years and that polar bears may disappear from most of their range within 100 years.

Today trophy hunting of polar bears in the U.S. is banned, and only Alaskan natives are allowed to hunt small numbers of bears for subsistence. Once sport hunting was prohibited in the U.S., some populations began to recover.

About these ads

4 responses

  1. The IUCN also says this about hunting polar bears…
    “Polar bear populations have been well managed, and where depleted have been recovered under conservation and management programs that involve regulated subsistence and conservation hunting, den site protection, bear-human conflict prevention and education programs operating since the 1960s.” – http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/susg/news/may06polarbear.htm

    Now small Canadian Villages have lost their income and the polar bear will lose major funding from research, and management programs because the hunters also funded that through their costs of hunting.

  2. Donald Wolberg

    One wonders at the naked stupidity of Congress and characters such as “Shifty” Harry Reed, a man who never seems to have missed an opportunity to pad his wallet with sweetheart realestate deals. And now Mr. Reed wishes to “protect” what does not need protection and punish those who do not need to be punished. No wonder the Congressional approval rating has sunk below that of used car salesmen, motivational speakers and Paris Hilton. Unfortunately for this stupid legislation, Polar Bears are a T&E species in the U.S., very well protected here, and are protected by management in Canada. Polar Bear census reports last I heard, were at 65,000, not 20,000 and increasing. Polar Bears have always been a “rare” species…they are the top dog carnivore (no pun) in their environment and each individual ranges over a vast territory. There never were herds of Polar Bears grazing bison-like on the seals of the ice pack. The Canadian “trophies” are collected under permit as a management tool to maintain the healt of the Canadian population and I suspect the Canadians would be upset with Mr. Shifty Reed to have implied otherwise. If folks are dumb enough to but these things and hang them on their walls. that is their issue and really has squat to do with “protecting” Polar Bears. It is just as likely that all the “trophies” will end up being sold anyway, just to a different market, perhaps China. China has always been a wonderful market for Black Bear gall bladders (a fortune per ounce) as a important Chinese Viagra…hmmmm, it seems to have worked. Perhaps Mr. Reed should take some of that dried and powdered gall bladder or find a new medication for Congressional common sense.

  3. Just to clarify, it was Jack Reed who sponsored the Reed Amendment, not Harry Reid (note spelling difference).

    Mr. Anderson: the IUCN also uplisted polar bears from “least concern” to “vulnerable.” It seems there is reason for protective measures to be taken.

  4. Donald Wolberg

    Indeed…sorry about the spelling…

    I confused Mr. Reid, the worst Democrat leader since Mr. KKK Robert Byrd, with my family practice guy, named Reed, a man for whom our tiny town has the highest regard

    Regarding Ursus mariimus, however, as early as 1993, populations were seen to be increasing. IUCN classifies the species as “conservation dependent” and it is covered by CITES and the U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act and is a T&E species. U.S. Fish and Wildlife allowed importation of “polar bear trophies taken in accordance with carefully regulated sport-hunting programs in the Northwest Territories.” This is/was a kind of mini-industry largely controlled by local folks, mostly indigenous people, so they are the losers unless the Europeans or Polar Bear hungry Latin Americans arrive. My point really is that there is a serious issue regarding animals and plants, not just the Polar Bear. Elephant populations, Asian and African apes, fishes, even clams and snails are threatened. The proble is huge and worldwide and requires significant investments and programs in figuring out ways to protect and preserve the biological diversity of this planet.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 973 other followers

%d bloggers like this: