Beating the Rap

The Governator must be breathing a sigh of relief. California will be spared a high-profile, expensive legal mess and Roman Polanski will stay in Europe– the Swiss refuse to extradite him.

I was not happy with the prospect of him coming back and straining our overloaded criminal justice system.

I would like to see some rational discussion of the abuses of power. Polanski, if he stays true to form, will be acting like he’s been vindicated, and exonerated, and his publicists will again be slandering his victim and her family. Or maybe he’ll just stop trying to get back in the US since he almost came here in cuffs.

He’s not a supercriminal. He’s ordinary. There’s people like him everywhere. Whenever we give power to an individual we risk making a tyrant, petty or large. It’s not as if children here were safe while this one perp was out of the country. It’s not as if adults don’t also suffer abuse.

Roman Polanski has not expressed remorse or even paid the compensation for damages he promised Samantha Geimer. But he did not completely escape justice.

The court of public opinion, that in the 1970′s convicted Geimer of being a ‘Lolita’ who inconvenienced a Great Man by telling the truth about what he did to her, has made a later judgment that the drug-facilitated rape of a child is a crime. We couldn’t even use words like that back then. It’s progress, of a bitter and ironic kind.

Today in the ACI there are people sitting in cells for smoking things or failing to pay fines. Law is law, and in this case Justice is God’s. Crimes against children are an assault on society, but this time the offender gets away. How do we repair the damage?

Parents want to know how to protect their children. America needs to create a society where our children can express their independence without such a high level of fear.

There’s a parallel here to the Catholic Church scandals. Polanski didn’t jump out of an alley, he won the trust of parents to get access to a child. He used prestige to get past the defenses that are intended to protect children. We can’t lock our children up, so the challenge is to find ways to identify abuse at the start, and to stop it.

Of course, teaching children early to question authority could have consequences later on. It’s an experiment I’d like to see. Maybe someone will make a film about the lies and bluffs and basic human frailty that induce us to give away power to people who are untrustworthy. Maybe that film has already been made. Seen any good movies lately?

SO MISUNDERSTOOD: Since some commenters may have mistaken my lack of faith in high-profile justice for an attempt to minimize an awful crime against a child, I offer my previous post from 2009, Fangirl and Fanboy,where I take on Hollywood apologists and link to some brave critics who tell it like it is. Myself, I’ve been on the press to tell the truth about Polanski for years, writing to the ProJo’s Michael Janusonis by snail mail before blogging was invented.

AND ANOTHER THING: A blast at Polanski from Salon.

THE WHOLE STORY: Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post sums it up, including a link to the victim’s testimony… (thanks to Daily Kos for the tip)

For Roman Polanski, the long, unspeakable nightmare of being confined to his three-story chalet in Gstaad, the luxury resort in the Swiss Alps, is finally over. The fugitive director is free once again to stroll into town, have a nice meal, maybe do a little shopping at the local Cartier, Hermes or Louis Vuitton boutiques.

Or he could just scurry like a rat into France or Poland, the two countries where he has citizenship — and where authorities have a long history of acting as if Polanski’s celebrity and talent somehow negate his sexual brutalization of a 13-year-old girl.

I’ve watched this case for over thirty years. For me the justice is in seeing a wilder and less timid press, aided by the Net, finally tell the truth. He did not ‘have sex with’ an underage girl. He raped a child. You can all thank the ‘feminazis’ and the ‘politically correct’ for the voice to say this. In the 70′s such words were not allowed in print, so all the media parroted the perp’s version. Like any other pitiful loser, Polanski made himself out to be the victim. He owes Samantha Geimer a settlement for the injury he inflicted, that he promised and never paid. He also owes her a public apology and to promise to stay out of her life. But he’ll die of old age before that happens.
California needs to put its money into getting active abusers tried and convicted. All fifty states need to put resources into prevention. If the Feds do scoop Polanski then let him face the judge like any other offender. Justice has already been greatly served by exposing his lies.

About these ads

8 responses

  1. well, anew kegal principle is suggested, its oK to commit a vicous crime (child rape in this case) but one can avoid prosecution if the case might overlaod the legal system.
    It also helps to be a rich celebrity

  2. michellefrommadison | Reply

    Roman Polanski proves Nancy Grace wrong, again.

    Nancy Grace is wrong for the tenth billionth time.

    Roman Polanski – a Free Man, proves Nancy Grace wrong again. CNN transcripts indicate that Nancy Grace said, repeatedly, that Roman would be prosecuted and will spend the rest of his life in prison, and “never see the light of day.” Wrong, Nancy. At least you are consistent at always being wrong about something of the cases she tries to cover. It’s no wonder why she was thrown out of Atlanta years ago and why she cannot practice Law anymore anywhere within the 50 states of the United States.

    http://frigginloon.wordpress.com/2010/07/12/switzerland-rejects-extradition-of-roman-polanski-back-to-the-us/

  3. I cannot understand you making such a fatuous claim that one more CHILD RAPIST in prison would overload the system.
    Spring a few grass dealers early,or commercial(not residential)burglars.
    What is it with you?Because Polansky is an “artist” he should get a pass?Please never again open your mouth aabout the rights of women.Every woman or girl has an absolute right not to be drugged and raped by anyone,creative genius or subnormal barbarian.Shame on you.This man deserves to rot in prison and get sodomized in the process.Actually,execution wouldn’t be a bad idea,but the Supreme Court requires you kill the woman in addition to raping her.
    This crime is worse than the average murder between people arguing with each other.And this was a child.You should really reconsider what you said here.

    1. michellefrommadison | Reply

      If you understood the actual court records of his case and the reasons why he pled guilty, then you would understand why he could never actually be convicted in any court for the alleged offense if it went to trial. Lots of people back then pleaded guilty to charges they were never actually guilty of committing because the risk of trial could not always guarantee the correct result. It also certainly does not mean his guilty plea was an actual admission of guilt to the crime, it only means he pleaded to the best option he faced with that court.

  4. BTW,when the child raping priest got his skull crushed in prison up at Walpole by a victim of male on male rape,it was true justice.I’ll never forget the interview of a professional killer in the “Iceman Tapes”where he was asked if there was anything he wouldn’t do and he looked at the reporter like he was crazy and said”Yeah,I’d never hurt a child,and I couldn’t commit a sex crime-I wouldn’t be able to carry out such a thing”.And he killed over a hundred people,most of whom were scum like him.

  5. If I’m not singling out Roman Polanski for aggressive prosecution across borders, it’s mostly because there are child abusers here and now who need to be locked up.
    Prison rape and brutality are crimes too, not an extra-judicial extension of state power.
    If you think I excuse Roman Polanski or his crime, then read my previous posts.

    1. michellefrommadison | Reply

      The actual crime was never proven at trial, he only pleaded as a possible certain better outcome, at least according to the facts of the case.

  6. I sure can’t read your mind.I just think this guy is a cockroach getting rhythm because he made some good movies.Wrong any way you look at it.He’s not being singled out.He’s subject to the same justice as any slob from a bad neighborhood who did the same thing.Difference being the slob will do 30 years in the slam and he’ll be sipping champagne and scarfing down caviar at film festivals.I hope sincerely he gets a very aggressive brain cancer and goes out hard.i guess I’m just a conservative egalitarian.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 993 other followers

%d bloggers like this: