One has to give the Bush administration credit. What they lack in common sense and insight, they more than make up for in sheer foolishness and chutzpah. Consider the following article from USA Today:
The federal government’s “no sex without marriage” message isn’t just for kids anymore.
Now the government is targeting unmarried adults up to age 29 as part of its abstinence-only programs, which include millions of dollars in federal money that will be available to the states under revised federal grant guidelines for 2007.
The government says the change is a clarification. But critics say it’s a clear signal of a more directed policy targeting the sexual behavior of adults.
“They’ve stepped over the line of common sense,” said James Wagoner, president of Advocates for Youth, a Washington, D.C.-based non-profit that supports sex education. “To be preaching abstinence when 90% of people are having sex is in essence to lose touch with reality. It’s an ideological campaign. It has nothing to do with public health.”
Abstinence education programs, which have focused on preteens and teens, teach that abstaining from sex is the only effective or acceptable method to prevent pregnancy or disease. They give no instruction on birth control or safe sex.
The National Center for Health Statistics says well over 90% of adults ages 20-29 have had sexual intercourse. [full text]
Those naughty 20-somethings! Doing with one another what the Bush administration has been doing to Americans of all ages for nearly 6 years. (At least, with the 20-somethings, itâ€™s presumably consensual.) One has to admire the stamina and persistence of Team Bush. Though America may chafe, they push onâ€”and blissfully ignore the scientific research that seriously questions the effectiveness of abstinence-only education (as discussed in an earlier post). Where is the sense in simply urging young adults to avoid sexual activity rather than take proper precautions? Frankly, it seems akin to advising young American soldiers in Iraq to just be careful rather than take care to wear body armor. Itâ€™s ridiculous.
Pat Crowley, blogger and labor activist, added a rather disturbing post to his blog last evening. It seems that while attending the Chafee-Whitehouse debate, wearing his George Bush mask to remind everyone of the high stakes for our fearless leader in Rhode Island’s senate election, someone tried to pull off his mask. Later, while he was videotaping, someone tried to push him to the ground.
It seems to me that this is cause for concern. We are trying to have a civilization here, folks. Let’s all do our best to mind our manners and keep our hands to ourselves for the next 7 days, ‘mkay?
â€œSimply stated, short of a crime, anything goes at the highest levels of the Department of the Interior.â€? â€”Earl E. Devaney, Inspector General for the Department of the Interior, in testimony before the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Energy and Resources, September 13, 2006.
Itâ€™s bad enough that the Bush administration is in bed with Big Oil, but to let the corporate grease monkeys engage in maneuvers that make even an Inspector General blanch is just disgusting, not to mention slatternly. And the Bushers just keep giving it away, as reported by Edmund L. Andrews in the New York Times:
The Interior Department has dropped claims that the Chevron Corporation systematically underpaid the government for natural gas produced in the Gulf of Mexico, a decision that could allow energy companies to avoid paying hundreds of millions of dollars in royalties.
The agency had ordered Chevron to pay $6 million in additional royalties but could have sought tens of millions more had it prevailed. The decision also sets a precedent that could make it easier for oil and gas companies to lower the value of what they pump each year from federal property and thus their payments to the government.
Interior officials said on Friday that they had no choice but to drop their order to Chevron because a department appeals board had ruled against auditors in a separate case.
But state governments and private landowners have challenged the company over essentially the same practices and reached settlements in which the company has paid $70 million in additional royalties. [full text]
I am not, by nature, a violent or vindictive person. Though I may rage at times against the injustice and inhumanity and incompetence that I witness around me, I thankfully seem to possess sufficient self-restraint and judgment not to act out the anger, frustration, and despair that such circumstances can evokeâ€”at least, not physically. Of course, being human and not wishing to bottle up all my feelings, I do occasionally indulge myself in vengeful imaginings. Itâ€™s a healthy tonic for these moronic times (and, apparently, still legal in 38 states). Thereâ€™s nothing like a little darkly retributive fantasy to put a spring in your step.
So what should greet my eyes like a rude poke today but news that the American death toll in Iraq for the month of October has reached 100, making it â€œthe fourth deadliest month for American troops since the war began in March 2003â€?? Meanwhile, as the blood of these brave young soldiers seeps into foreign soil, the second coming of the Three Stoogesâ€”Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeldâ€”continue to insist, despite all evidence to the contrary, that there is â€œa plan for victoryâ€? and â€œthe outcome is certain. Weâ€™ll prevail.â€? What a load of horse manure! They can attempt to cover or pretty it up all they want, but, at the end of the day, it still smells like crap and draws flies. Such glib assurances from those who, by proxy, wreak horrible death and destruction anger me deeply.
And then I happened to read a news story about â€œan inmate accused of forcibly tattooing a slain 10-year-old girlâ€™s name onto her killerâ€™s forehead in an Indiana prison.â€? While I do not approve of such vigilante justice, this event led me down a dim corridor to an intriguing revenge fantasy, which, if acted out, might look something like this:
Should the Democrats gain control of the House and Senate, perhaps they ought considerâ€”as an alternative to impeaching President Bush and his fellow scofflawsâ€”forcibly tattooing them with the names of all the fallen. Their punishment would be to endure this process and thereafter to serve as living memorials to the thousands of Americans who nobly gave their lives for a less than noble cause. Doesnâ€™t that seem fair?
Of course, this is little more than fanciful musing. Nonetheless, to quote Robert Frost, such imagining â€œhas given my heart / a change of mood / and saved some part / of a day I had rued.â€?
Fears of Inquiry Dampen Giving by U.S. Muslimsâ€”An insightful piece by Neil MacFarquhar in the New York Times that relates how, â€œfearful that donations to an Islamic charity could bring unwanted attention from federal agents looking into potential ties to terrorism, many Muslim Americans have become reluctant to donate to Islamic causes, including charities.â€?
â€˜Nothingâ€™s wrong with youâ€™â€”The second of an informative four-part series by Thomas Farragher of the Boston Globe that offers a personal glimpse into the lives of two soldiers struggling to survive â€œthe war after the war.â€?
Bush Appointee Said to Reject Advice on Endangered Speciesâ€”An article by Juliet Eilperin of the Washington Post that describes how â€œa senior Bush political appointee at the Interior Department has rejected staff scientistsâ€™ recommendations to protect imperiled animals and plants under the Endangered Species Act at least six times in the past three years.â€?
Camden eateryâ€™s framed gull found in violation of 1918 lawâ€”An article by Tom Groening of the Bangor Daily News (in Maine) that illustrates the paucity of common sense many government officials possess, as evidenced by the attempted confiscation of a 150+-year-old stuffed bird.
Zillow.com is a website which gives you instant home appraisals. But some people are not happy about the service and believe it is compromising the ability of consumers to buy real estate.
A consumer advocacy group has filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission about the inaccuracies of the Zillow estimates and how they are hurting home buyers. CNN Money has an article about it here.
Dear Fellow Cranston Resident and Neighbor:
As President of the Cranston Citizens for Responsible Zoning and Development, a local non-profit association with over 250 families living in the Eden Park, Garden City and Auburn neighborhoods that formed to promote safe and reasonable development within our City, I am seeking your help in opposing a project which may threaten the health and welfare of your home and family.
You are most likely aware by now that the current Cranston Administration approved the construction and operation of a full scale batch concrete plant earlier this year in such a manner as to avoid what we believe to be a number of legal notice requirements and protection standards. Such plant is proposed to be located on Marine Drive (off Pontiac Avenue) in Cranston — a site that places it within a one mile radius of highly populated areas including the Garden City, Eden Park, Auburn, Dean Estates and Meshanicut neighborhoods. In addition such plant would be constructed in close proximity to at least three public and private schools and less than 700 feet from the CLCF practice fields that are used by our children almost every night of the week between spring and fall.
On September 28, 2006 a similar concrete plant in Charlestown, MA had part of its processing system explode resulting in the release over 3000 pounds of raw concrete dust into the local environment, blanketing a large area with hazardous crystalline silica and sending 61 people to local hospitals.
Since July of 2006, when knowledge of the Cranston concrete plant approval became public, our Association has worked tirelessly to organize, raise funds to mount a costly legal appeal, and contact endless state and local representatives to force the Laffey Administration to revoke the questionable building permit for plant construction. At present we have an appeal of the building permit pending before the Cranston Zoning Board, and we gained the support of the Cranston City Council who passed a complete ban of concrete plants in January of this year only to have the City Administration silently approve the Marine Drive plant days before the official ban became law.
Despite our current progress we still need the help and support of all concerned citizens to overcome the wealth and influence of the concrete plant developer, as well as the arrogance of the Laffey administration that refuses to revoke this unjustified building permit in the face of apparent overwhelming state and local law. Please consider supporting this effort, both financially and by volunteering your time, and help preserve the health and safety of our neighborhoods (as well as the value of our heavily taxed homes). Join our association today and become part of the growing opposition to this proposed concrete plant.
Contact us by phone or fax at (401) 223-4800, or by email at email@example.com. Please consider a generous donation today, payable to “CCRZD” and mail it to PO BOX 20442, Cranston, RI 02920 [receipts will be provided.]
Our website at www.stopcranstonconcerete.org provides the history and background of this project, as well as updates on related events, public hearings, and photos and aerial views of the proposed site to help keep you informed.
Your time and support is deeply appreciated as we work to “beat City Hall” and eliminate one of the most potentially hazardous projects ever approved by a sitting Cranston Administration.
Frank Mattiucci, President
Previous posts on Kmareka regarding the proposed concrete plant can be found here:
Not surprisingly, The Providence Journal has endorsed Lincoln Chafee, citing as one main reason a factor similar to the one I described when I was interviewed by NPR and they asked why I thought many Rhode Islanders were still undecided about the Senate race: because Chafee has brought us many dollars, and losing his tenured position in the Senate will likely reduce those dollars in the short-term. The long-term payoff of switching to Sheldon Whitehouse is obvious to many of us, but not to everyone. Generally, people have a hard time with delayed gratification, and as the saying goes, a bird in the hand is worth two Bushes more than a Whitehouse. You know what I mean.
But ultimately it seems that the Projo endorsements have little impact. They endorsed Aram Garabedian for Mayor of Cranston back in 2002, for example, and yet people chose the fresh and promising face of Steve Laffey. Now they are endorsing the “status quo” candidate again, but my feeling is that this will have little impact. The poor performance of our Republican-controlled Congress has led many people to make up their minds already, and the polls say that Rhode Island is ready to let go of the Chafee legacy.