Here we have another rather tremendous speech from Barack Obama, reflecting on our American struggle with people questioning each other’s patriotism. He has some great historical references and also brings in his personal life in ways that make him so much an average person — that his grandmother worked in a bomb-making factory (mine did too!), that his mother read to him from the Constitution while they were abroad, to make sure he understood what it meant to be an American. It’s wonderful to have a presidential candidate who can think and write and convey meaning from his own experience and from his knowledge of history and government.
Remarks of Senator Barack Obama
The America We Love, as prepared for delivery
Monday, June 30th, 2008
On a spring morning in April of 1775, a simple band of colonists farmers and merchants, blacksmiths and printers, men and boys left their homes and families in Lexington and Concord to take up arms against the tyranny of an Empire. The odds against them were long and the risks enormous for even if they survived the battle, any ultimate failure would bring charges of treason, and death by hanging.
And yet they took that chance. They did so not on behalf of a particular tribe or lineage, but on behalf of a larger idea. The idea of liberty. The idea of God-given, inalienable rights. And with the first shot of that fateful day a shot heard round the world — the American Revolution, and America’s experiment with democracy, began.
Those men of Lexington and Concord were among our first patriots. And at the beginning of a week when we celebrate the birth of our nation, I think it is fitting to pause for a moment and reflect on the meaning of patriotism — theirs, and ours. We do so in part because we are in the midst of war — more than one and a half million of our finest young men and women have now fought in Iraq and Afghanistan; over 60,000 have been wounded, and over 4,600 have been laid to rest. The costs of war have been great, and the debate surrounding our mission in Iraq has been fierce. It is natural, in light of such sacrifice by so many, to think more deeply about the commitments that bind us to our nation, and to each other.
We reflect on these questions as well because we are in the midst of a presidential election, perhaps the most consequential in generations; a contest that will determine the course of this nation for years, perhaps decades, to come. Not only is it a debate about big issues — health care, jobs, energy, education, and retirement security — but it is also a debate about values. How do we keep ourselves safe and secure while preserving our liberties? How do we restore trust in a government that seems increasingly removed from its people and dominated by special interests? How do we ensure that in an increasingly global economy, the winners maintain allegiance to the less fortunate? And how do we resolve our differences at a time of increasing diversity?
Finally, it is worth considering the meaning of patriotism because the question of who is — or is not — a patriot all too often poisons our political debates, in ways that divide us rather than bringing us together. I have come to know this from my own experience on the campaign trail. Throughout my life, I have always taken my deep and abiding love for this country as a given. It was how I was raised; it is what propelled me into public service; it is why I am running for President. And yet, at certain times over the last sixteen months, I have found, for the first time, my patriotism challenged — at times as a result of my own carelessness, more often as a result of the desire by some to score political points and raise fears about who I am and what I stand for.
So let me say this at the outset of my remarks. I will never question the patriotism of others in this campaign. And I will not stand idly by when I hear others question mine.
My concerns here aren’t simply personal, however. After all, throughout our history, men and women of far greater stature and significance than me have had their patriotism questioned in the midst of momentous debates. Thomas Jefferson was accused by the Federalists of selling out to the French. The anti-Federalists were just as convinced that John Adams was in cahoots with the British and intent on restoring monarchal rule. Likewise, even our wisest Presidents have sought to justify questionable policies on the basis of patriotism. Adams’ Alien and Sedition Act, Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans — all were defended as expressions of patriotism, and those who disagreed with their policies were sometimes labeled as unpatriotic.
In other words, the use of patriotism as a political sword or a political shield is as old as the Republic. Still, what is striking about today’s patriotism debate is the degree to which it remains rooted in the culture wars of the 1960s — in arguments that go back forty years or more. In the early years of the civil rights movement and opposition to the Vietnam War, defenders of the status quo often accused anybody who questioned the wisdom of government policies of being unpatriotic. Meanwhile, some of those in the so-called counter-culture of the Sixties reacted not merely by criticizing particular government policies, but by attacking the symbols, and in extreme cases, the very idea, of America itself — by burning flags; by blaming America for all that was wrong with the world; and perhaps most tragically, by failing to honor those veterans coming home from Vietnam, something that remains a national shame to this day.
Most Americans never bought into these simplistic world-views — these caricatures of left and right. Most Americans understood that dissent does not make one unpatriotic, and that there is nothing smart or sophisticated about a cynical disregard for America’s traditions and institutions. And yet the anger and turmoil of that period never entirely drained away. All too often our politics still seems trapped in these old, threadbare arguments — a fact most evident during our recent debates about the war in Iraq, when those who opposed administration policy were tagged by some as unpatriotic, and a general providing his best counsel on how to move forward in Iraq was accused of betrayal.
Given the enormous challenges that lie before us, we can no longer afford these sorts of divisions. None of us expect that arguments about patriotism will, or should, vanish entirely; after all, when we argue about patriotism, we are arguing about who we are as a country, and more importantly, who we should be. But surely we can agree that no party or political philosophy has a monopoly on patriotism. And surely we can arrive at a definition of patriotism that, however rough and imperfect, captures the best of America’s common spirit.
What would such a definition look like? For me, as for most Americans, patriotism starts as a gut instinct, a loyalty and love for country rooted in my earliest memories. Iâ€™m not just talking about the recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance or the Thanksgiving pageants at school or the fireworks on the Fourth of July, as wonderful as those things may be. Rather, I’m referring to the way the American ideal wove its way throughout the lessons my family taught me as a child.
One of my earliest memories is of sitting on my grandfather’s shoulders and watching the astronauts come to shore in Hawaii. I remember the cheers and small flags that people waved, and my grandfather explaining how we Americans could do anything we set our minds to do. That’s my idea of America.
I remember listening to my grandmother telling stories about her work on a bomber assembly-line during World War II. I remember my grandfather handing me his dog-tags from his time in Patton’s Army, and understanding that his defense of this country marked one of his greatest sources of pride. That’s my idea of America.
I remember, when living for four years in Indonesia as a child, listening to my mother reading me the first lines of the Declaration of Independence — “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” I remember her explaining how this declaration applied to every American, black and white and brown alike; how those words, and words of the United States Constitution, protected us from the injustices that we witnessed other people suffering during those years abroad. That’s my idea of America.
As I got older, that gut instinct that America is the greatest country on earth would survive my growing awareness of our nation’s imperfections: it’s ongoing racial strife; the perversion of our political system laid bare during the Watergate hearings; the wrenching poverty of the Mississippi Delta and the hills of Appalachia. Not only because, in my mind, the joys of American life and culture, its vitality, its variety and its freedom, always outweighed its imperfections, but because I learned that what makes America great has never been its perfection but the belief that it can be made better. I came to understand that our revolution was waged for the sake of that belief that we could be governed by laws, not men; that we could be equal in the eyes of those laws; that we could be free to say what we want and assemble with whomever we want and worship as we please; that we could have the right to pursue our individual dreams but the obligation to help our fellow citizens pursue theirs.
For a young man of mixed race, without firm anchor in any particular community, without even a father’s steadying hand, it is this essential American idea — that we are not constrained by the accident of birth but can make of our lives what we will — that has defined my life, just as it has defined the life of so many other Americans.
That is why, for me, patriotism is always more than just loyalty to a place on a map or a certain kind of people. Instead, it is also loyalty to America’s ideals — ideals for which anyone can sacrifice, or defend, or give their last full measure of devotion. I believe it is this loyalty that allows a country teeming with different races and ethnicities, religions and customs, to come together as one. It is the application of these ideals that separate us from Zimbabwe, where the opposition party and their supporters have been silently hunted, tortured or killed; or Burma, where tens of thousands continue to struggle for basic food and shelter in the wake of a monstrous storm because a military junta fears opening up the country to outsiders; or Iraq, where despite the heroic efforts of our military, and the courage of many ordinary Iraqis, even limited cooperation between various factions remains far too elusive.
I believe those who attack America’s flaws without acknowledging the singular greatness of our ideals, and their proven capacity to inspire a better world, do not truly understand America.
Of course, precisely because America isn’t perfect, precisely because our ideals constantly demand more from us, patriotism can never be defined as loyalty to any particular leader or government or policy. As Mark Twain, that greatest of American satirists and proud son of Missouri, once wrote, “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.” We may hope that our leaders and our government stand up for our ideals, and there are many times in our history when that’s occurred. But when our laws, our leaders or our government are out of alignment with our ideals, then the dissent of ordinary Americans may prove to be one of the truest expression of patriotism.
The young preacher from Georgia, Martin Luther King, Jr., who led a movement to help America confront our tragic history of racial injustice and live up to the meaning of our creed — he was a patriot. The young soldier who first spoke about the prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib — he is a patriot. Recognizing a wrong being committed in this country’s name; insisting that we deliver on the promise of our Constitution — these are the acts of patriots, men and women who are defending that which is best in America. And we should never forget that — especially when we disagree with them; especially when they make us uncomfortable with their words.
Beyond a loyalty to America’s ideals, beyond a willingness to dissent on behalf of those ideals, I also believe that patriotism must, if it is to mean anything, involve the willingness to sacrifice — to give up something we value on behalf of a larger cause. For those who have fought under the flag of this nation — for the young veterans I meet when I visit Walter Reed; for those like John McCain who have endured physical torment in service to our country — no further proof of such sacrifice is necessary. And let me also add that no one should ever devalue that service, especially for the sake of a political campaign, and that goes for supporters on both sides.
We must always express our profound gratitude for the service of our men and women in uniform. Period. Indeed, one of the good things to emerge from the current conflict in Iraq has been the widespread recognition that whether you support this war or oppose it, the sacrifice of our troops is always worthy of honor.
For the rest of us — for those of us not in uniform or without loved ones in the military — the call to sacrifice for the country’s greater good remains an imperative of citizenship. Sadly, in recent years, in the midst of war on two fronts, this call to service never came. After 9/11, we were asked to shop. The wealthiest among us saw their tax obligations decline, even as the costs of war continued to mount. Rather than work together to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and thereby lessen our vulnerability to a volatile region, our energy policy remained unchanged, and our oil dependence only grew.
In spite of this absence of leadership from Washington, I have seen a new generation of Americans begin to take up the call. I meet them everywhere I go, young people involved in the project of American renewal; not only those who have signed up to fight for our country in distant lands, but those who are fighting for a better America here at home, by teaching in underserved schools, or caring for the sick in understaffed hospitals, or promoting more sustainable energy policies in their local communities.
I believe one of the tasks of the next Administration is to ensure that this movement towards service grows and sustains itself in the years to come. We should expand AmeriCorps and grow the Peace Corps. We should encourage national service by making it part of the requirement for a new college assistance program, even as we strengthen the benefits for those whose sense of duty has already led them to serve in our military.
We must remember, though, that true patriotism cannot be forced or legislated with a mere set of government programs. Instead, it must reside in the hearts of our people, and cultivated in the heart of our culture, and nurtured in the hearts of our children.
As we begin our fourth century as a nation, it is easy to take the extraordinary nature of America for granted. But it is our responsibility as Americans and as parents to instill that history in our children, both at home and at school. The loss of quality civic education from so many of our classrooms has left too many young Americans without the most basic knowledge of who our forefathers are, or what they did, or the significance of the founding documents that bear their names. Too many children are ignorant of the sheer effort, the risks and sacrifices made by previous generations, to ensure that this country survived war and depression; through the great struggles for civil, and social, and worker’s rights.
It is up to us, then, to teach them. It is up to us to teach them that even though we have faced great challenges and made our share of mistakes, we have always been able to come together and make this nation stronger, and more prosperous, and more united, and more just. It is up to us to teach them that America has been a force for good in the world, and that other nations and other people have looked to us as the last, best hope of Earth. It is up to us to teach them that it is good to give back to one’s community; that it is honorable to serve in the military; that it is vital to participate in our democracy and make our voices heard.
And it is up to us to teach our children a lesson that those of us in politics too often forget: that patriotism involves not only defending this country against external threat, but also working constantly to make America a better place for future generations.
When we pile up mountains of debt for the next generation to absorb, or put off changes to our energy policies, knowing full well the potential consequences of inaction, we are placing our short-term interests ahead of the nation’s long-term well-being. When we fail to educate effectively millions of our children so that they might compete in a global economy, or we fail to invest in the basic scientific research that has driven innovation in this country, we risk leaving behind an America that has fallen in the ranks of the world. Just as patriotism involves each of us making a commitment to this nation that extends beyond our own immediate self-interest, so must that commitment extends beyond our own time here on earth.
Our greatest leaders have always understood this. They’ve defined patriotism with an eye toward posterity. George Washington is rightly revered for his leadership of the Continental Army, but one of his greatest acts of patriotism was his insistence on stepping down after two terms, thereby setting a pattern for those that would follow, reminding future presidents that this is a government of and by and for the people.
Abraham Lincoln did not simply win a war or hold the Union together. In his unwillingness to demonize those against whom he fought; in his refusal to succumb to either the hatred or self-righteousness that war can unleash; in his ultimate insistence that in the aftermath of war the nation would no longer remain half slave and half free; and his trust in the better angels of our nature — he displayed the wisdom and courage that sets a standard for patriotism.
And it was the most famous son of Independence, Harry S Truman, who sat in the White House during his final days in office and said in his Farewell Address: “When Franklin Roosevelt died, I felt there must be a million men better qualified than I, to take up the Presidential task. But through all of it, through all the years I have worked here in this room, I have been well aware that I did not really work alone — that you were working with me. No President could ever hope to lead our country, or to sustain the burdens of this office, save the people helped with their support.”
In the end, it may be this quality that best describes patriotism in my mind — not just a love of America in the abstract, but a very particular love for, and faith in, the American people. That is why our heart swells with pride at the sight of our flag; why we shed a tear as the lonely notes of Taps sound. For we know that the greatness of this country — its victories in war, its enormous wealth, its scientific and cultural achievements — all result from the energy and imagination of the American people; their toil, drive, struggle, restlessness, humor and quiet heroism.
That is the liberty we defend — the liberty of each of us to pursue our own dreams. That is the equality we seek — not an equality of results, but the chance of every single one of us to make it if we try. That is the community we strive to build — one in which we trust in this sometimes messy democracy of ours, one in which we continue to insist that there is nothing we cannot do when we put our mind to it, one in which we see ourselves as part of a larger story, our own fates wrapped up in the fates of those who share allegiance to America’s happy and singular creed.
Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.
(Cross-posted from my private practice site.)
Edutopia has a fantastic June issue with a focus on using new media in education. In particular, they have a video about Albano Berberi, a blind high school student who uses assistive technology to do things like computer programming, video-game playing, and composing musical scores that he then performs on violin. Here is a link to the video.
Another interesting short article, “Wii Love Learning,” discusses the use of the Nintendo Wii in an Indiana elementary school. The educational potential of the Wii is just beginning to be recognized. Expect more uses for this versatile high tech game platform in the future.
But also, remember to unplug! The need for exercise in our culture — real live running around and engaging in activities that stretch and build muscle, raise your heart rate, your pulse, and all the rest, are just as important as ever. As this article indicates, while there is evidence that many things can enhance cognitive functioning, the one thing with the strongest research base indicating positive brain functioning enhancement is exercise.
Also, the need for face-to-face communication and relationships is still essential. The experience of having a conversation with someone when you can look into their eyes is still something we all need, and no amount of social utility networks and blog surfing can replace this.
Cindy Fogarty sent out the following announcement:
As you may be aware, I have recently announced that I am seeking the Democrat Nomination for Mayor of Cranston. The present mayor has determined that he is unable to seek a second term. After discussions and decisions throughout the Democrat Party, I was unanimously endorsed at the City Committee meeting last week.
In order to make an official announcement and kick off the campaign season, a press conference is going to be held on Tuesday, July 1 at 4 pm, outside Cranston City Hall.
All of the Democrat slate of candidates will be on hand to begin the discussion of issues important to all of us in Cranston.
I would be grateful if you could take a few moments from your day on Tuesday to join me in this announcement.
For those who are on Facebook, there is a Cindy Fogarty for Mayor group that you can join in order to show your support. This is a fun, easy way to rally for Cindy and also see who else is supporting her. If you are not on Facebook, now might be a good time to join. It only takes a minute to sign up and you will likely find many learning and networking opportunities as you surf around this growing “social utility.”
The Budlong pool is now open, and today is a beautiful day to go test the waters. I hear they’re reliably cold as the season opens. A little background from the Cranston Wikipedia page, for those who don’t know:
Cranston is home to the Budlong Pool, one of the largest outdoor swimming pools in the country. Built in the 1950s as a Works Progress Administration project, it is a staple of the community.
With all the outdoor water parks that have sprung up in the past few years, I wonder if Budlong is still one of the largest. Nevertheless, it is a great place to hang out with the kids for the summer. See you there!
I received an invitation to attend the Air National Guard community initiative, LEADRI, and am planning to be there tomorrow. I am told that the air show this year will include the British Red Arrows who are featured in the video above. It should be quite the event!
LEADRI stands for Leaders Encouraging Advancement and Development for Rhode Island. It’s a program of the Air National Guard designed to “forge a close bond between the Guard and the diverse communities in Rhode Island,” according to invitational letter. I’m looking forward to this exciting opportunity.
Andre Araujo alerted me this morning that we have challengers for all of our school committee seats in Cranston except for the seats of Former Mayor Michael Traficante and Frank Lombardi. Here is the rundown:
FRANK S LOMBARDI — City-wide
JESSICA D ROSNER — Ward 1
STEVEN A STYCOS — Ward 1 Incumbent
STEPHANIE A CULHANE — Ward 2
DEBORAH C GREIFER — Ward 2 Incumbent
PAULA B M MCFARLAND — Ward 3
CATHRYN NOTA — Ward 3
MOSES P SAYGBE JR — Ward 3
JANICE RUGGIERI — Ward 4
BRUCE P SACCOCCIO — Ward 4
MICHAEL A TRAFICANTE — Ward 5
JULIE M COLANGELO — Ward 6
ANDREA M IANNAZZI — Ward 6 Incumbent
For anyone who knows one of the 9 million people worldwide who play World of Warcraft online and has listened to them talk about playing the game, this is pretty funny.
Rachel McNally, President of Save Cranston’s Open Space, is tossing her hat into the ring for City Council in Cranston. She states in the following letter that the current Ward 6 Council representative, Jeff Barone, will not be seeking re-election.
Dear Neighbors and Friends,
I have decided to run for the Ward 6 Cranston City Council seat because I feel that is the best way to continue my efforts to protect the quality of life in our neighborhoods. I will be running as an Independent and ask that you continue to support the work that I have done on all of our behalves. Over the past year, I have proven my dedication to issues of concern to residents and will continue to do so. Factoring into this decision was the fact that Jeff Barone, our current City Councilman, chose not to seek re-election. I see this as an opportune time to take my commitment of representing the best interests of the residents of Ward 6 to a higher level.
As your Councilwoman, I would be a strong advocate for protecting the Mulliganâ€™s Island property from ill-conceived commercial development and work with you on issues that affect the quality of life in our neighborhoods. You have seen what I can accomplish when I am motivated by the best interests of the community and have the support of my neighbors. You also know that my commitment to protecting our homes and neighborhoods is unwavering and holding a position on the City Council would enable me to have a stronger voice in the City and to keep the concerns of Ward 6 in the forefront.
In order to campaign effectively and maintain the integrity of Save Cranstonâ€™s Open Space, I will be stepping down as President during the election season. Lori Chartier will be acting as President of Save Cranstonâ€™s Open Space until after the election, at which time the outcome of my campaign will be decided. I understand that this will be an uphill battle, but so was stopping the big-box development at Mulliganâ€™s Island and a city-owned ballfield; yet, together we were able to accomplish that. I am confident that I am the best person to represent Ward 6 and ask you to remember my commitment to you and know that you can count on me to work diligently to serve as your voice in City Council. I have earned your trust and will work to maintain that trust because it means a great deal to me.
If you are interested in assisting me in anyway or would like to be added to my official campaign e-mail list, please contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Independent for Ward 6
To the concerned citizens who posted handbills all over the South end of Angell Street, right off Wayland Square –
I give you an â€˜Aâ€™ for effort. You not only covered every telephone pole, sometimes twice, but you chose a screaming flourescent green color that is impossible to ignore. Unfortunately I have to give you an â€˜Fâ€™ for public relations. You are anonymous. When you urge us to â€˜Call our reps and RIPTA and voice your protest today!!!â€™ donâ€™t expect me to jump.
â€œYOUR PROPERTY VALUE JUST WENT DOWN, due to NOISE and AIR POLLUTION, TRASH, LOITERING, and SHAKING STRUCTURES (OUR HOMES)!!!â€?
I think you would do better to ask your neighbors why a lawn the size of a handkerchief requires a giant truck, three guys with leaf blowers, two guys with power mowers and an underground sprinkler system to keep it green. You canâ€™t enjoy the beautiful walk down Elmgrove Ave for the excruciating noise and diesel fumes. Not to mention the workers without ear protection or dust masks. What are they, expendable? Just imagine the whir of a hand mower and the smell of cut grass. Imagine it, because youâ€™ll seldom see it.
And the traffic. There must be a sale on Hummers, because theyâ€™re everywhere — clogging our narrow streets and parked on corners so that you canâ€™t see whatâ€™s coming. Also, summer is motorcycle season. Fuel efficient, but way noisier than buses.
Maybe itâ€™s the â€˜loiteringâ€™. Letâ€™s clarify. — waiting for the bus is not loitering. Anyone who wants to loiter in Wayland Square has had easy access via several bus routes since the dawn of time, and they can even stop off at the Salvation Army while theyâ€™re there. Adding a stop will not change anything, except maybe to make using the bus more convenient.
Why is this important? Because gas is not getting cheaper. Because good public transit would aid employment, and relieve people of the necessity to maintain a P.O.S. car in order to work. A really good public transit system might persuade some drivers who need to hang up their license to finally do it — and you East Siders know what I am talking about.
So, you anonymous people who posted the handbill — thanks for the contact info. Iâ€™ve already emailed all the people on it to declare my support for making RIPTA as accessible and convenient as possible, and Iâ€™m reproducing the list hereâ€”
Councilman Cliff Wood 521-7477 Cliff@councilmancliff.com
Senator Rhoda E. Perry 222-1734 x711 Senemail@example.com
Representative Edith A. Ajello Repfirstname.lastname@example.org
Representative David A. Segal Repemail@example.com
If you think that public transit is one of the solutions to pollution, gridlock and dependence on foreign oil then contact them and show your support.
The Secretary of State, Ralph Mollis, wants to make sure everyone knows that this Wednesday, June 25, 2008, is the deadline for filing for candidacy. Secretary Mollis cares deeply about everyone being as involved as possible in the political process and so has sent this message out, to make sure everyone knows what to do if they want to run for election:
Candidates for federal office must file Declarations of Candidacy with Mollis at his Elections Division, 148 West River St., Providence. Anyone who is planning to run for state or local office must file with the board of canvassers in the city or town that is their legal residence.
â€œA number of other crucial dates in the election calendar are just around the corner. Ensuring our elections are accessible to those who vote and those who hope to serve is one of my priorities,â€? said Mollis.
The next important milestone is July 1, when candidates can pick up nomination papers. Candidates for federal office can obtain the forms from Mollisâ€™ Elections office. Candidates for state and local offices should pick up their papers at the Cranston Board of Canvassers.
State law then gives candidates until July 11 to collect the signatures of enough eligible voters to officially put them on the ballot. The threshold ranges from 50 signatures for the state House of Representatives to 1,000 signatures for the U.S. Senate.
All the necessary forms as well as a calendar with every key date leading up to Rhode Islandâ€™s primary and general election are posted on Mollisâ€™ website.
Every time around, I contemplate running for school committee. This is one of the most important positions that a person can take on in a community. Not only are you working for the purpose of providing the best education for our children, but you are also responsible for more than half of most municipal budgets. For these reasons, it seems to me that school committees are as important if not more important than city councils.
So why don’t I run? Lots of reasons. But I may run two years from now.